Civil Litigation
What Is Civil Litigation?
Civil litigation is a legal dispute between two or more parties that seek money damages or specific performance rather than criminal sanctions. A lawyer who specializes in civil litigation is known as a “litigator” or “trial lawyer.” Lawyers who practice civil litigation represent parties in trials, hearings, arbitrations, and mediations before administrative agencies, foreign tribunals, and federal, state, and local courts. The Law Office of Mark A. Reed is experienced in general civil litigation.
General civil litigation, as the name implies, applies to a broad range of laws and the associated litigation of civil law. Civil law is designed to settle disputes between individuals, organizations, associations, business entities, etc. General civil litigation defines the legal status of each party without criminal action and usually includes some sort of compensation for the plaintiff. The plaintiff is the person that files a pleading or files a complaint against the defendant.
A dispute or complaint is normally settled by a lawsuit in which the plaintiff seeks reimbursement for damages, reparations for a breach of contract, compensation for injuries, business disputes, or a host of other issues involving reward, punitive damages, or contract violations to be decided by civil court proceedings.
General civil litigation can be filed against individuals, groups, associations, business entities, organizations, companies, or government agencies. General civil litigation matters can involve economic restitution, compensation for an injured party, deterrence from future actions, or retribution for a wrong or wrongdoing.
The Law Office of Mark A. Reed has expansive knowledge of general civil litigation and can provide legal assistance and representation for the majority of litigation problems that may arise.
Economics of a Civil Lawsuit
A civil lawsuit is so expensive these days that it is not typically affordable unless the attorney is willing to contract with the client on the basis of contingency. However, because lawyers rarely accept defense cases on a contingency basis, the defendant of a civil lawsuit usually has little choice but to defend the action on an hourly fee basis. That raises questions: Why are lawyers so expensive? How can the law be for all of the people if it is only affordable to the wealthy? Why do “good” law firms charge so much money? What is a “good” law firm? How important are lawyers who are specialists; why can't any lawyer handle any matter?
$50,000.00 Cases: While it may be difficult to say with certainty how much an average lawsuit costs, typical lawsuits have, from the author's experience, been known to cost up to about $50,000 in legal fees and costs. For example, $25,000.00 can easily be estimated as a reasonable cost to defend against a civil lawsuit prior to trial preparation. The attorney's fees for trial preparation and the trial itself could also run up to $25,000.00. Can the average defendant, or an average plaintiff for that matter, afford legal representation?
Hourly Charges: Defense lawyers typically charge their clients by the hour and the average going rate is between $200.00 -$350.00 per hour, depending on the lawyer, the law firm, the nature of the case. Every action taken by a lawyer is a billable transaction. All phone calls are billable, including client calls and emails seeking to be reassured. Legal Process: Preparing and filing the answer to the complaint are usually the first official steps in the legal process. A good lawyer might reasonably spend up to 15 hours taking all the steps necessary to prepare and file an answer; thus, depending on the lawyer's hourly rate, that initial task may cost up to $5,000.00. The filing of an answer to a complaint reduces a lot of pressure on both the lawyer and the client and ensures that the defendant's default is avoided. That is why most attorneys will usually request a retainer fee between $5,000.00-$7,500.00 plus costs upfront.
The process called discovery is next, during which interrogatories (written questions) and depositions (face-to-face attorney questioning of witnesses recorded by a stenographer) are held by both sides.
The Purpose of “Discovery”: The public would do well to understand that the legal process was changed decades ago to allow both sides the right and opportunity to find out all of the relevant facts on which the other side is relying. The other aim of discovery is to allow for the lawyers to eliminate legal theories that are not supported by the facts prior to the trial — so as to eliminate surprises at trial and save the precious time of very overcrowded courts.
To many clients, whose idea of lawyering is courtroom work, the largely invisible discovery period does not seem like it should gobble up as much money as it does. To the attorneys, however, the discovery period is where the winning case is shaped and where the foundation is laid for a successful outcome. Essentially, the unglamorous, hard grind, but necessary work, is completed during the discovery period. Depending on the complexity of a given lawsuit, the number of witnesses, and the volume of documents involved, $15,000.00 can easily be consumed during discovery. Summary Judgment Motion: At some point during the discovery period, the defense or plaintiff s lawyer may, if s/he believes that appropriate facts and circumstances exist, ask the court to rule that the plaintiff has no case or that the defendant has no viable defense. This procedure is called a motion for Summary Judgment. Under the philosophy that everyone is entitled to his or her day in court, judges are reluctant to rule for defendants in this procedure unless there is absolutely no case for the plaintiff or no defense for the defendant. If the defendant prevails, the case is over — without a trial. $5,000.00 - $10,000.00 can easily be consumed in a Summary Judgment motion. By this time, $25,000.00 - $30,000.00 could easily have been billed — and, often, the defendant client will feel it is worth the price if things end there. Things do not, however, usually end there; and the client will likely become inclined to believe that the unsuccessful procedure was an unnecessary and wasteful use of his or her money. Noteworthy is the fact that lawyers cannot predict the outcome of a given lawsuit. This inability to predict outcomes should not - and often does not - deter the good lawyer from presenting arguably correct motions. It should also be noted that while the court might not grant the summary motion in full, and thus completely disposing of the case, it may nonetheless grant it in part and thus pairing down the issues to be tried. This will help in preparing for trial and actually reduce the fees for the trial.
Settlement Negotiations: As the facts are collected and the strength of the plaintiff's case and defendant's defense are respectively re-evaluated, attempts will usually be made to find a dollar amount (if appropriate) at which the whole matter can be dropped so that people can go back to making money. Sometimes, a settlement can be effected. However, depending on the passion involved, the matter may sometimes fail to settle. And, $5,000.00 can be consumed in settlement negotiations, which often involve mediation or settlement conferences before a neutral mediator or judge.
Trial Preparation: Prior to the courtroom theatrics, a whole lot of largely invisible work will be billed to the client as the lawyer organizes the facts for a logical presentation at trial. During this stage, a lawyer also spends a great deal of time interviewing and preparing the witnesses who will be called to testify at the trial. This also might include preparing motions such as Motions in Limine—to exclude evidence, testimony, etc. As much time can be consumed in the preparation for the trial as will be spent at trial. $8,000.00 can be easily consumed during trial preparation.
Trial: Taking a lawyer out of his or her office for the entire work (billing) day will cause a client to be charged for the entire time — including the time during which both lawyer and client are at court waiting to be assigned a courtroom. For example, eight hours times $350.00 per hour will cause a defendant to be charged $2,800.00 for each day of trial. Imagine a five-day trial for a “simple” matter that revolves around the trier of fact (judge or a jury) believing or disbelieving one set of facts or another. $14,000.00 is easily consumed. Double the days to ten (10) days, and $28,000.00 is easily consumed. This also doesn't include preparation after the court day is over for the next day in court.
Bottom line------In the end, either you win or you lose. Sometimes with the costs involved, you can lose for winning.
(Note—the above only represents an estimate of costs. Every case is different)
What should I consider before pursuing a civil lawsuit?
What kinds of things should I consider before pursuing a civil lawsuit?
I break it down into 3 important things:
1. Can you win
2. Is it economically feasible to pursue
3. If you win, can you collect? (Applies to only Plaintiffs)
A closer look at the above--There are a few important legal questions you should ask. First of all, do you have a valid claim? Can you win? A valid claim is one where the grievance can be resolved by legal action. For instance, and by way of example only, say you decide to take a cruise and the ship's captain gets a little tipsy one night, running the ship aground. You are thrown from your bed, breaking your arm and suffering a concussion. You would have a pretty good negligence case against the captain and the cruise company. But say instead that it was cloudy for the whole week of your cruise, thwarting your planned dream tan. Unless the cruise company had made a specific guarantee of sunny weather (which is very unlikely), your disappointment has no legal remedy.
Next, do you have standing? To initiate a lawsuit you must have standing, which means you must be sufficiently affected by the matter at hand. In other words, you can't sue just because something bad happens. Also, something bad must happen to you or have had an adverse effect, directly or indirectly, upon you. For instance, you cannot sue your local paper for libeling your best friend. You also cannot sue a local developer just because a building he designed is excruciatingly ugly.
If, however, the building is next door to your home and would block your light or somehow directly intrude on your property, then you might have the standing to try and stop the development. Lastly, each state has laws, known as statutes of limitations, that require you to bring a suit within a certain period after an injury. The time limits vary from state to state and for different types of cases. Some limits may be as short as thirty (30) days, and they are seldom greater than six (6) years. In cases where the injury is not immediately apparent (for example, a person has been exposed to a substance that causes cancer many years later) the time period in which a person can bring a lawsuit usually starts when the person knew or should have known of the injury. Typically, in California, some of the statutes of limitations are as follows:
Personal Injury/Negligence
2 years
Wrongful Death
2 years
Breach of Contract-written
4 years
Breach of Contract-oral
2 years
Is it economically feasible? Basically, this means will it cost you more to pursue or defend than what you can either win or lose? See my blog on the economics of a civil lawsuit for more information on this subject. For example: let's say someone owes you $12,00.00. Yes, that is a lot of money, but your attorney fees could easily cost you more than that amount to try and collect, and that doesn't even guarantee that you will actually win your case.
If you win, can you collect? Basically, this simply means, even if you win your case and receive a judgment can you collect on it? I am sure you might have heard of the term—judgment proof. This means that they are almost impossible to collect from. If they don't have a job you cannot garnish their wages for example.
Once you've considered these legal questions, the most important question is whether a lawsuit can in fact solve your problem. You may have a grievance with someone, but suing won't necessarily help. Litigation can take years, and lawyers are expensive (though in some cases you will not have to pay upfront). The tone, money, and effort involved in a lawsuit are not always worth it B even if you win B so you should objectively analyze your chances. Do you have evidence? Witnesses? Can you prove with the assistance of your attorney, that the other party violated some legal duty to you? Also, you should think about the personal effect of litigation. The other party will likely try to discredit you and your claims, which can be one of the more painful parts of the adversarial process. You might also consider whether your case will draw a lot of publicity, and if so, whether you want it. Most significantly, analyze whether your personal feelings, anger, resentment, hostility, or other motivation may be clouding your objectivity in determining your chances of success.
After considering all of the above, you will then be in a better position to decide how you would like to proceed. You are now able to make an informed decision.